Pakisan and India Fight and West reaps the Fruits

whenever Pakistanis and Indians fight, no side gets benefit. Only west gets.
Pakistanis and Indians must understand that their fighting on ambiguous historical facts and politicians and media with hidden agendas is doing no good to any nation. It has been a hurdle in the prosperity of the region and the subsequent dependence on western shameful aid…
Learn from China + Taiwan + S. Korea + Japan… They are strongly against each other, but they are doing a lot of trades and who gets benefits? The whole region. And western financial, military and political dominance is disturbed and that is why they are shitting in china sea to engage them in wars and buy western weapons…
Wake up stupid and idiot people….

Its all about economy

India is killing innocent people in Kashmir and everyone knows it. But no one is doing nothing. Libya killed a few ones, and now Libya is under attack.
What is the reason no one telling anything serious to India?
Reason: Its simple. India is going to be an economic power and it has a lot of potential and will be very helpful to USA and Europe.
Now, if India kills all Kashmiris, it will be ok to USA and Europe as long as India is beneficial to USA and Europe.
But where are human Rights? No no, there are no human-rights. Everything revolve around economy. Libya is not an emerging economy, thats why it is under attack.
Human Rights is a slogan from USA and Europe which is based on the money and economy…
Friends and Enemies: There are no friends and enemies, only helpful and non-helpful economies…

Why should not world hate US?

It is a matter of record that even after more than five years of his arrest, the US government has refused to try the alleged mastermind of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, in a normal civil federal court.

Why would the US government not pursue the Al Qaeda money trail leading to 9/11 attacks? Why would the CIA destroy video tapes containing hundreds of hours of interrogations of Al Qaeda detainees in Guantanamo Bay? Why would it obstruct independent investigation by members of the US Congress? Why would the Pentagon and the CIA not try Khalid and other Al Qaeda members in a normal court?

These are crucial and extremely important questions. Unless the US can answer these critical questions, its critics can rightfully and legitimately question its theory that Al Qaeda has safe havens in Pakistan.

In the past, the US intelligence had concluded that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. That was a lie that has been so well documented that it needs no further comment. The real motive was to conquer Iraq and control its oil fields.

In October 2007, President Bush had suggested that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to “World War III” and Vice President Dick Cheney promised “serious consequences” if the government in Tehran did not abandon its nuclear program. But the US establishment and its intelligence agencies had decided to shift their focus away from Iran. In December 2007, a National Intelligence Estimate that represented the consensus view of all 16 American spy agencies, concluded that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that the program remained frozen, contradicting its own judgment in 2005 that Tehran was working relentlessly toward building a nuclear bomb.

Given that the US has thus far failed to establish the responsibility for 9/11 attacks, the fact that there has been no attack by Al Qaeda on the US soil since 9/11, the real motive behind Iraq War, and the systematic disinformation campaign about Iran’s nuclear program, it is perfectly logical to question the real motives of the US policy in Pakistan.

Ref: []

Some other Questions:

  • Who will suffer from all of this?
  • Is the new coming government of US seems to make the situation worse?
  • If yes, then who is responsible?
  • System, Media, American People, Congress, Democracy, who?

Thats why US is hated by world…

The thing about this statement was that it hardly lay in the mouth of the American president to condemn the Palestinians for an attack in which Israeli civilians died when no US president – neither Bush nor Clinton nor any of their predecessors – has ever condemned any Israeli government for attacks by Israeli military forces against Palestinian civilians, such as the artillery bombardment carried out by the Israeli army against a UN observers compound in southern Lebanon a few years ago in which more than 100 Palestinian civilians, including women and children, who had taken shelter in the compound, were killed. That, too, was the deliberate act of murder of innocent civilians. So why didn’t the US government condemn it? Was it because the victims in that case were Palestinian civilians?

A moral position can only be considered moral when it is applied equally across the board to incidents of a similar nature. Thus when the US condemns Palestinian attacks against Israeli civilians, it must, by the same token, condemn Israeli attacks against Palestinian civilians. Yet it doesn’t. It never has, and there is nothing to suggest that it ever will – unless the influence of the powerful Israeli lobby in Washington diminishes to the point that American politicians are no longer afraid to speak out against Israel when it does something wrong, such as killing Palestinian civilians. So strong is the Israeli lobby, however, that the possibility of such a change of heart ever occurring in America remains remote.

Ref: []

This also destroys the image of Jews, and people in world think that everything Israel is doing is by Jews and for Jews. Jews are requested to take these maters serious as it is showing them as a root of all evils.